LANSING, Mich. (Michigan News Source) – A recent court decision has once again stirred up Michigan’s electoral landscape, as a judge has ruled that liberal activist and independent presidential candidate, Cornel West, must be included on the state’s ballot. The ruling overturned an earlier decision by the Michigan Bureau of Elections concerning West’s affidavit of identity.
A judge’s ruling for “democracy”?
Judge James Robert Redford handed down the ruling on Saturday, instructing state officials to “qualify” West and his running mate, Melina Abdullah, provided their submitted signatures meet the required verification standards. Redford said that West was not required to file the affidavit of identity because the court says, “The affidavit of identity (AOI) filing requirement does not apply to a candidate nominated for the office of President of the United States or Vice President of the United States.” Redford goes on to say, “The Court respectfully concludes the SOS and Director of the Bureau of Elections (DBOE) misapplied the law in finding otherwise.”
MORE NEWS: Bedrock, GM Propose $250M in Taxpayer Money for Ren Cen Revamp
The ruling, while a win for West, is a considerable blow to Democrats who had hoped to limit competition on the ballot and marks a significant setback for Michigan Democratic Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, whose attempts to exclude West from the ballot have been criticized as “voter suppression” by the watchdog group Fair Election Fund.
West responds.
West said about the decision in a statement, “This ruling is not just a legal victory – it is a moral victory for everyone who believes in the sanctity of the democratic process. Our campaign submitted over 26,000 signatures, significantly more than required, which the court recognized as a legitimate expression of the people’s will. We are grateful for this affirmation and promise to continue championing the rights of all voters.”
In another decision in West’s favor, the Michigan Board of State Canvassers voted 3-1 on Monday to certify West’s candidacy, even though questions have been raised about the validity of some signatures on his nominating petitions.
Legal challenges loom.
Democratic strategist and attorney Mark Brewer, who is also a former Michigan Democratic Party Chair, who has challenged West’s petition signatures, strongly objected to the board’s decision, accusing them of neglecting their duty by allowing what he described as “forged” signatures to be accepted. Brewer has vowed to appeal the certification as well as the Redford decision which has been appealed to the Michigan Court of Appeals.
Despite these accusations, the Michigan Bureau of Elections defended its certification process, asserting that West would still have enough valid signatures to qualify, even if the disputed ones were discarded. The board’s discussions underscored the tension between following established procedures and addressing emerging concerns, with the lone dissenting member, Mary Ellen Gurewitz, advocating for more stringent verification measures.
Countdown to election day: the clock is ticking.
In a state that could very well be pivotal in the upcoming presidential election, Democrats are facing challenges on multiple fronts. Beyond the presence of independent candidates like West and Kennedy on the Michigan ballot, the party may also have to struggle to secure votes from its own base if Vice President Kamala Harris does not align with the radical demands of anti-Israel voters in Southeast Michigan.
MORE NEWS: Otsego County Man Faces Poaching Charges
As Michigan News Source reported yesterday, anti-Israel “uncommitted” voters have given Harris a deadline to meet with them and change her position on the Israel/Hamas war. The loss of their support would be a significant impediment for Harris and the hopes of Democratic Party victories in the state.
With absentee ballots set to hit mailboxes in just 31 days and early voting kicking off as soon as October 6th in some precincts, Michigan’s political landscape could see a seismic shift if the Democratic Party fails to secure its traditionally expected support.
Leave a Comment
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.