LANSING, Mich. (Michigan News Source)The Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) announced its endorsement of State Representative Andrew Fink (R-Hillsdale) for the Michigan Supreme Court on July 16, citing his consistent voting record and dedication to constitutional principles.

Established in 1964, CPAC is recognized as “the nation’s oldest conservative grassroots organization” and aims to “preserve and protect the values of life, liberty, and property for every American.” This mission aligns with the principles upheld by Fink, who represents Michigan’s 35th District in the House of Representatives and recently earned a 95% lifetime voting record from the CPAC Foundation.

MORE NEWS: Crews Clean Up Styrofoam Along Lake Superior

CPAC Chairman and Former White House Political Director, Matt Schlapp, expressed his confidence in Fink’s ability to maintain his conservative stance if elected to the Michigan Supreme Court. In a post on X, Schlapp said: “CPAC endorses Andrew Fink for Michigan Supreme Court. Unfortunately, we have seen too many examples of people who campaign as conservatives for judicial positions, but then transform into liberals once they put on their robes. We are confident this will not be the case with Andrew Fink.”

Fink’s own words from his campaign website emphasize his dedication to the rule of law over personal views: “I am running for the Michigan Supreme Court because our justice system needs to be focused on the law, not the personal views of the judge. Upholding our Constitutional rights is a judge’s sacred duty because every one of us deserves due process, equal protection of the laws, and the guarantee of a fair day in court. I am ready to take the oath of office and do justice under law.”

Fink’s personal background includes years of public service and active community engagement. After graduating from Hillsdale College in 2006 and the University of Michigan Law School in 2010, Fink served in the United States Marine Corps. He has been an advocate for conservative principles both in his legislative role and in his legal practice.