ANN ARBOR, Mich. (Michigan News Source) – In a dramatic turn of events, a group of pro-Palestinian students at the University of Michigan (UM) have taken over the student government with a radical agenda: no funding for anyone until the university divests from its Israeli-related investments.

Dubbed the “Shut It Down” movement, their strategy is simple but effective – take control of the student government, and pull the financial plug on all student organizations. With the student government’s annual $800,000 budget now held hostage, campus life is set to face major disruptions.

MORE NEWS: Tornado Relief Stalled as FEMA Holds the Line

The budget is paid for by a $11.19 fee from the students each semester and the group already shut down the summer funding. A similar decision about the fall funding is expected to be forthcoming.

All or nothing.

Led by newly elected student body president Alifa Chowdhury, the Shut It Down campaign was clear from the start: no funding would be allocated to any student group until the university regents divest UM’s $17.9 billion endowment from companies tied to Israel.

Chowdhury argues that the election was a clear mandate from the student body to force the university’s hand. However, this drastic move has set the stage for a massive backlash, as more than 1,700 student groups find themselves suddenly stripped of their opportunities for financial assistance.

Of the 1,700 student groups are organizations related to childhood trauma, autism, African-American studies, medicine, Christianity, LGBTQ issues and more. They also include the 100 pro-Palestinian groups that are organized under the TAHRIR Coalition. In order to receive funding the groups have to submit an application and the maximum award per group per semester is $10,000.

Protests, politics, and potential backlash.

The situation is precarious as many of the students are being made aware about the impacts of the new student government decisions. While the Shut It Down movement has undoubtedly made its mark, history suggests such tactics may not end well. Critics, including former student government members, warn that this approach could backfire spectacularly, rallying a counter-movement against the radical policies.

With students returning to campus and the reality of a defunded student life setting in, the battle lines are drawn. The question now is whether the movement’s strategy will force the university to cave or ignite a broader pushback from a large frustrated student body.

The administration’s dilemma.

MORE NEWS: Aldi Looks to Hire 13,000 Store and Warehouse Workers Nationwide

UM’s administration is caught in the crossfire. As the financial chokehold tightens, university officials are scrambling to find alternative funding solutions to keep essential student services afloat. Talks of temporary funding from the Dean of Students’ office are underway, but the long-term impact remains uncertain. The university’s leadership must now navigate this politically charged situation with caution, balancing the demands of a vocal minority against the broader needs of the campus community.